Training Feedback Survey — Q2-2026

78 / 120 respondents submitted (65%)

65%
78 / 120
Response Rate
All
Batch A
Batch B
78
Submitted
65%
Completion Rate
3.8 ⭐
Avg Rating
Q1. Overall, how would you rate this training?
Rating avg 3.8 / 5
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
15  19%
⭐⭐⭐⭐
35  45%
⭐⭐⭐
18  23%
⭐⭐
8  10%
⭐
2  3%
Q2. How likely are you to recommend this course?
NPS
+15
Promoters 40%
Passives 35%
Detractors 25%
Promoters  31 responses (40%) · Score 9–10
Passives  27 responses (35%) · Score 7–8
Detractors  20 responses (25%) · Score 0–6
Q3. How well was the content structured?
Single Choice
Very Well
28  36%
Well
32  41%
Somewhat Well
14  18%
Poorly
4  5%
Q6. Any additional comments?
Text 78 text responses
"The trainer's delivery was excellent. Very practical examples."
"Would love more time for hands-on exercises."
View All Responses →

Text Responses

Q6. Any additional comments? — 78 responses

Respondent #12
·
12 Jun · 11:32
Submitted
The trainer's knowledge of the subject matter was exceptional. The case studies really helped clarify complex concepts.
Respondent #23
·
13 Jun · 14:45
Submitted
I enjoyed the interactive exercises. Would have liked more time for the hands-on labs.
Respondent #31
·
14 Jun · 09:15
Submitted
Very well organized course. Clear objectives and practical takeaways.
Respondent #45
·
15 Jun · 16:30
Submitted
Excellent pacing and good variety of teaching methods. The group activities were particularly useful.
Respondent #67
·
16 Jun · 11:00
Submitted
Some modules could be condensed. Overall a valuable training experience.

Respondent Response Detail

Click any row in the respondent table below to view their full submitted response.
# Name Status Submitted At Actions
1 Arun Krishnamurthy Submitted 12 Jun · 11:32
2 Priya Mehta In Progress — Not submitted
3 Kavya Reddy Submitted 11 Jun · 15:47
4 Rajan Iyer Submitted 12 Jun · 09:05
5 Sneha Pillai Not Started — Not submitted
6 Vikram Nair Submitted 13 Jun · 16:22
7 Deepa Subramaniam Submitted 14 Jun · 10:18
8 Arjun Bhat In Progress — Not submitted