Performance Dashboard
FY2026 Β· All Departments Β· As of June 2026
3
Active Plans
47
Pending Evaluations
184
Finalised This Year
6
PIP Active
| Plan | Period | Employees | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 Annual | Apr 25βMar 26 | 230 | Active |
| Q4 Quarterly | JanβMar 26 | 45 | Active |
| Probation H1 | AprβSep 25 | 18 | Finalized |
Grade Distribution β FY2026 Annual
A
14%
B
38%
C
33%
D
10%
F
5%
Recent Activity
Anita Sharma submitted self-evaluation
FY2026 Annual Β· 2h ago
Ravi Kumar β evaluation accepted by manager
FY2026 Annual Β· 4h ago
PIP auto-created for Priya Menon (Score: 38%)
Finalize cascade Β· Yesterday
TNA generated β 3 employees below threshold
KRA: Technical Excellence Β· Yesterday
Q4 Quarterly plan closed by HR Admin
Today 09:15 AM
Pay revision triggered for 12 employees
Finalize cascade Β· 2 days ago
Appraisal Plans
Manage annual, quarterly, and probation cycles
| Code | Plan Name | Type | Period | Entry Window | Employees | Status | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FY26-ANN | FY2026 Annual Appraisal | 360Β° | Apr 2025 β Mar 2026 | Apr 1 β Apr 30 | 230 | Active | |
FY26-Q4 | Q4 Quarterly Review | Manager | Jan β Mar 2026 | Apr 1 β Apr 15 | 45 | Active | |
FY26-PRO | Probation H1 2026 | Self+Manager | Apr β Sep 2026 | Oct 1 β Oct 15 | 18 | Pending | |
FY25-ANN | FY2025 Annual Appraisal | 360Β° | Apr 2024 β Mar 2025 | Apr 1 β Apr 30 | 218 | Closed |
Plan Setup β FY2026 Annual
Configure KRA structure and weightage for this cycle
Plan Details
| KRA | Measure Wt% | Goal Wt% | Sort | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Excellence | 1 | |||
| Customer Focus | 2 | |||
| Delivery Quality | 3 | |||
| Leadership | 4 | |||
| 5 |
Appraisals β FY2026 Annual
230 employees Β· 47 pending evaluation
| Employee | Department | Score | Grade | Evaluators | Status | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anita Sharma Sr. Engineer | IT | 78.4% | B | Self β Β· Manager β | Finalized | ||
| Ravi Kumar Analyst | Finance | 65.2% | C | Self β Β· Manager β | Accepted | ||
| Priya Menon Associate | HR | 38.1% | D | Self β Β· Manager β | Accepted | ||
| Karthik Nair Tech Lead | IT | β | β | Self β Β· Manager β | Submitted | ||
| Divya Ramesh Manager | Sales | β | β | Self β Β· Manager β | Pending |
Showing 5 of 230 Β· Page 1 of 46
Evaluation Form β Anita Sharma
FY2026 Annual Β· Manager Evaluation Β· Due: Apr 30, 2026
π Technical Excellence Measure Wt: 40% Β· Goal Wt: 20%KRA Score: 81.5
Measure
Target
Achieved
Score (0-100)
Code Quality (Defect Rate)
< 2 defects/sprint
1.4 defects/sprint
Delivery Velocity
40 story pts/sprint
38 story pts
π― Customer Focus Measure Wt: 25% Β· Goal Wt: 10%KRA Score: 72.0
Measure
Target
Achieved
Score (0-100)
CSAT Score
β₯ 4.2 / 5.0
4.1 / 5.0
Response SLA Adherence
95%
93%
π Delivery Quality Measure Wt: 20% Β· Goal Wt: 15%KRA Score: 79.0
Measure
Target
Achieved
Score (0-100)
On-Time Delivery Rate
90%
88%
Bell Curve Analysis
Grade distribution across appraisal plan
Grade Distribution (230 employees)
β Normal distribution overlay (dashed line)
| Grade | % Band | Count | % | Avg Score | Eligible for Increment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A β Outstanding | 85 β 100 | 32 | 14% | 91.2 | Yes (10-15%) |
| B β Exceeds Expectations | 70 β 84 | 87 | 38% | 76.8 | Yes (6-9%) |
| C β Meets Expectations | 55 β 69 | 76 | 33% | 62.1 | Standard (3-5%) |
| D β Needs Improvement | 40 β 54 | 23 | 10% | 47.5 | No increment |
| F β Below Expectations | 0 β 39 | 12 | 5% | 31.2 | PIP Required |
Performance Trend
Historical score trajectory per employee
Score History β Anita Sharma
| Cycle | Period | Final Score | Grade | Increment % | Pay Revision |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2022 Annual | Apr 21 β Mar 22 | 68.2% | C | 3.5% | Applied |
| FY2023 Annual | Apr 22 β Mar 23 | 72.1% | B | 6.0% | Applied |
| FY2024 Annual | Apr 23 β Mar 24 | 75.4% | B | 7.5% | Applied |
| FY2025 Annual | Apr 24 β Mar 25 | 70.3% | B | 6.5% | Applied |
| FY2026 Annual | Apr 25 β Mar 26 | 78.4% | B | 8.0% (proposed) | Pending |
PIP Plans
Performance Improvement Plans β Active & Historical
| Employee | Manager | Start Date | End Date | Reason | Actions Completed | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priya Menon | Suresh V. | May 1, 2026 | Jul 29, 2026 | Score: 38.1% (below 40%) | 1 of 3 | Active | |
| Amit Das | Riya P. | Mar 1, 2026 | May 29, 2026 | Score: 35.5% (below 40%) | 3 of 3 | Closed | |
| Sneha Joshi | Suresh V. | Jun 1, 2026 | Aug 29, 2026 | Auto-created (Score: 36%) | 0 of 4 | Draft |
PIP Detail β Priya Menon
Manager: Suresh Venkataraman Β· May 1 β Jul 29, 2026
| Action | Due Date | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete advanced SQL certification (provide certificate) | May 31, 2026 | Completed | |
| Submit weekly progress report to manager every Friday | Jul 4, 2026 | In Progress | |
| Achieve 70%+ in next quarterly KRA review (Customer Focus) | Jul 15, 2026 | Pending | |
TNA Requests
Training Needs Analysis β auto-generated from finalization cascade
| Employee | KRA | Gap Score | Training Suggestion | Status | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priya Menon | Technical Excellence | 38.1% | Advanced SQL, System Design Fundamentals | Pending | ||
| Amit Das | Customer Focus | 44.5% | Effective Communication, Stakeholder Management | Pending | ||
| Sneha Joshi | Delivery Quality | 36.2% | Agile Project Management, Code Review Practices | Sent |
My Appraisal
Employee Self Service β FY2026
AS
Anita Sharma
Senior Engineer Β· IT Department Β· Employee ID: 201
Grade B Finalized No Active Appeal
78.4%
FY2026 Score
Current Appraisal β FY2026 Annual
Finalized Finalized on Apr 15, 2026
Self Evaluation: Submitted Apr 5
Manager Evaluation: Submitted Apr 10 (Suresh V.)
Pay Revision: 8.0% increment β pending payroll processing
OKR Progress β Q1 2026
Reduce API response time by 20%85%
Onboard 3 junior developers67%
Complete AWS certification40%
KRA Score Breakdown
Technical Excellence81.5
Customer Focus72.0
Delivery Quality79.0
Leadership68.0
Feedback & Recognition
βββββ 3 feedback responses received
π 1 recognition received this quarter
No active PIP
KRA Master
Key Result Areas β master definitions used across appraisal types
| ID | Code | KRA Name | Nature | Status | Used In | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | TECH-EXC | Technical Excellence | Performance | Active | 3 plans | |
| 8 | CUST-FOC | Customer Focus | Performance | Active | 3 plans | |
| 9 | DEL-QUAL | Delivery Quality | Performance | Active | 2 plans | |
| 12 | LEAD-GRW | Leadership & Growth | Personal Dev | Active | 1 plan | |
| 15 | INNOV | Innovation & Initiatives | Personal Dev | Inactive | 0 plans | |
| β | β |
Masters
Appraisal Types, Measures, and Rating Scales
| Code | Name | Nature | Status | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
360 |
360Β° Review | Multi-evaluator | Active | |
MGR |
Manager Only | Single evaluator | Active | |
SM |
Self + Manager | Dual evaluator | Active |
| Code | Name | Type | Unit | Description | Status | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEF-RATE |
Defect Rate | Quantitative | defects/sprint | No. of defects per sprint | Active | |
VELOCITY |
Delivery Velocity | Quantitative | story pts | Story points completed per sprint | Active | |
CSAT |
CSAT Score | Quantitative | out of 5 | Customer satisfaction rating | Active | |
FEEDBACK |
Manager Feedback Quality | Qualitative | β | Qualitative manager rating | Active |
| Grade | Grade Name | Min % | Max % | Increment Range | Color | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Outstanding | 85 | 100 | 10 β 15% | ||
| B | Exceeds Expectations | 70 | 84 | 6 β 9% | ||
| C | Meets Expectations | 55 | 69 | 3 β 5% | ||
| D | Needs Improvement | 40 | 54 | 0% | ||
| F | Below Expectations | 0 | 39 | 0% + PIP Required |
Configuration
System thresholds and defaults for PERM module
MPERMCONFIG β System Thresholds
PIPTriggerThreshold
%
Auto-create PIP when final score falls below this value
TNAGapThreshold
%
Auto-generate TNA request when KRA score falls below this value
SelfWeightDefault
%
Default weight of self-evaluation in final score consolidation
PIPDurationDays
days
Default duration for auto-created PIP plans
My Pending Tasks
Employee Self Service β FY2026 Β· Anita Sharma
1
Self-Assessments Pending
2
Evaluations to Submit
1
Acknowledgements Due
0
Appeals Pending Review
βοΈ Section A β My Appraisals to Fill 1 pending
| Plan | Period | Type | Due Date | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 Annual | Apr 2025 β Mar 2026 | 360Β° Review | Apr 30, 2026 | Pending Self-Eval | |
| Q4 Quarterly | Jan β Mar 2026 | Manager | Apr 15, 2026 | Submitted |
π Section B β Pending Evaluations to Submit (as Assessor / Manager) 2 pending
| Employee | Designation | Plan | Due Date | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karthik Nair | Tech Lead | FY2026 Annual | Apr 30, 2026 | Pending Evaluation | |
| Divya Ramesh | Manager | FY2026 Annual | Apr 30, 2026 | Pending Evaluation | |
| Priya Menon | Associate | Q4 Quarterly | Apr 15, 2026 | Submitted |
β
Section C β Acknowledgements Due 1 due
| Plan | Period | Final Score | Grade | Status | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2026 Annual | Apr 2025 β Mar 2026 | 78.4% | Grade B | Awaiting Acknowledgement |
Self Assessment β Anita Sharma
FY2026 Annual Β· Apr 2025 β Mar 2026 Β· Due: Apr 30, 2026
βΉοΈ Note: Your self-assessment will be visible to your manager only after you submit. Save as Draft to continue later.
Self-Assessment
π Technical Excellence Measure Wt: 40% Β· Goal Wt: 20%Self Score: 82.0
Measure
Target
Achieved
Manager Score
Self Score (0-100)
Code Quality (Defect Rate)
< 2 defects/sprint
1.4 defects/sprint
85 (mgr)
Delivery Velocity
40 story pts/sprint
38 story pts
78 (mgr)
π― Customer Focus Measure Wt: 25% Β· Goal Wt: 10%Self Score: 74.0
Measure
Target
Achieved
Manager Score
Self Score (0-100)
CSAT Score
β₯ 4.2 / 5.0
4.1 / 5.0
72 (mgr)
Response SLA Adherence
95%
93%
72 (mgr)
π Delivery Quality Measure Wt: 20% Β· Goal Wt: 15%Self Score: 81.0
Measure
Target
Achieved
Manager Score
Self Score (0-100)
On-Time Delivery Rate
90%
88%
79 (mgr)
Scores & Appeal β FY2026 Annual
Anita Sharma Β· Grade B Β· 78.4% Final Score
Scores Released
Scores were released to you on Apr 15, 2026
| KRA | Manager Score | Self Score | Variance | Consolidated | Manager Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Excellence Wt: 40% | 81.5 | 82.0 | +0.5 | 81.7 | Strong code quality; velocity slightly below target |
| Customer Focus Wt: 25% | 72.0 | 74.0 | +2.0 | 72.6 | CSAT slightly missed target; SLA adherence at 93% |
| Delivery Quality Wt: 20% | 79.0 | 81.0 | +2.0 | 79.6 | Good on-time delivery; minor scope slippage noted |
| Leadership Wt: 15% | 68.0 | 70.0 | +2.0 | 68.6 | Improvement area β needs more proactive stakeholder communication |
| Final Consolidated Score | 78.4% | Grade B | |||
* Consolidated score = Manager Score Γ 70% + Self Score Γ 30% (based on SelfWeightDefault config)
Raise an Appeal
β οΈ Appeals can only be raised within 7 days of score release. Deadline: Apr 22, 2026. You have 7 days remaining.
Discussion Thread β FY2026 Annual Appraisal
Hi Anita, your FY2026 appraisal has been finalized. Please review your scores and acknowledge.
Thank you. I've reviewed the scores. I have a question on the Leadership KRA β the score of 68 seems low given the cross-team projects I led in H2.
Good point Anita. Those projects weren't formally mapped to KRA measures this cycle. I'll review and see if we can adjust. In the meantime, feel free to raise an appeal through the formal process.
Understood. I will raise a formal appeal for the Leadership KRA.